Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Michigan vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of Michigan vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of MichiganUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities
137Roster56
92 overRoom under the D-I cap11 over
21Coaches9
$2,952,308Team budget$1,889,972
$21,549Spend per roster spot$33,749
93rdBudget percentile83rd
983APR (multi-year)984
98%Players retained98%
$17,359,163Athletic aid, men's teams$9,757,332
33,730Undergraduates39,556
18%Admitted77%
1350–1530SAT middle 50%1310–1480
93%Graduate in 6 years85%
$75,626Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$52,780
$19,005Net price after grants$16,730
2.06Violent offences per 1,0001.09
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board