Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Miami (Florida) vs University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of Miami (Florida) vs University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Division I · Atlantic Coast Conference
| University of Miami (Florida) | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| 112 | Roster | 118 |
| 67 over | Room under the D-I cap | 73 over |
| 7 | Coaches | 6 |
| $3,653,260 | Team budget | $2,365,390 |
| $32,618 | Spend per roster spot | $20,045 |
| 96th | Budget percentile | 85th |
| 992 | APR (multi-year) | 983 |
| 99% | Players retained | 98% |
| $9,527,348 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $8,028,006 |
| 12,883 | Undergraduates | 20,681 |
| 19% | Admitted | 19% |
| 1330–1470 | SAT middle 50% | 1370–1530 |
| 84% | Graduate in 6 years | 92% |
| $88,440 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $56,450 |
| $41,028 | Net price after grants | $11,140 |
| 0.69 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.17 |
| Suburb | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board