Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Washington
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Washington

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Maryland, College ParkUniversity of Washington
100Roster85
55 overRoom under the D-I cap40 over
9Coaches7
$2,160,267Team budget$3,534,453
$21,602Spend per roster spot$41,581
84thBudget percentile96th
989APR (multi-year)992
99%Players retained98%
$8,222,557Athletic aid, women's teams$7,984,481
30,608Undergraduates39,515
45%Admitted43%
1370–1520SAT middle 50%—
88%Graduate in 6 years84%
$59,686Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$63,906
$15,833Net price after grants$11,023
0.86Violent offences per 1,0000.66
SuburbSettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board