Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Southern California
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Southern California

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Maryland, College ParkUniversity of Southern California
100Roster88
55 overRoom under the D-I cap43 over
9Coaches8
$2,160,267Team budget$3,652,298
$21,602Spend per roster spot$41,503
84thBudget percentile96th
989APR (multi-year)1000
99%Players retained99%
$8,222,557Athletic aid, women's teams$13,525,051
30,608Undergraduates21,023
45%Admitted10%
1370–1520SAT middle 50%1440–1550
88%Graduate in 6 years92%
$59,686Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$90,453
$15,833Net price after grants$41,496
0.86Violent offences per 1,0001.57
SuburbSettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board