Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Maryland, College ParkUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln
100Roster122
55 overRoom under the D-I cap77 over
9Coaches8
$2,160,267Team budget$3,691,809
$21,602Spend per roster spot$30,260
84thBudget percentile97th
989APR (multi-year)985
99%Players retained99%
$8,222,557Athletic aid, women's teams$5,591,586
30,608Undergraduates19,338
45%Admitted77%
1370–1520SAT middle 50%1090–1330
88%Graduate in 6 years66%
$59,686Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$46,296
$15,833Net price after grants$18,029
0.86Violent offences per 1,0001.2
SuburbSettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board