Programs›Women's Cross Country›University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Women's Cross Country · head to head
University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Maryland, College Park | University of Nebraska-Lincoln | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 992 | APR (multi-year) | 979 |
| 98% | Players retained | 99% |
| $8,222,557 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $5,591,586 |
| 30,608 | Undergraduates | 19,338 |
| 45% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1370–1520 | SAT middle 50% | 1090–1330 |
| 88% | Graduate in 6 years | 66% |
| $59,686 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $46,296 |
| $15,833 | Net price after grants | $18,029 |
| 0.86 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.2 |
| Suburb | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board