Programs›Women's Soccer›University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Women's Soccer · head to head
University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Maryland, College Park | University of Minnesota, Twin Cities | |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | Roster | 29 |
| 4 over | Room under the D-I cap | 1 over |
| 4 | Coaches | 4 |
| $1,975,248 | Team budget | $2,210,521 |
| $61,726 | Spend per roster spot | $76,224 |
| 80th | Budget percentile | 83rd |
| 986 | APR (multi-year) | 997 |
| 98% | Players retained | 100% |
| $8,222,557 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $9,264,581 |
| 30,608 | Undergraduates | 39,556 |
| 45% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1370–1520 | SAT middle 50% | 1310–1480 |
| 88% | Graduate in 6 years | 85% |
| $59,686 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $52,780 |
| $15,833 | Net price after grants | $16,730 |
| 0.86 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.09 |
| Suburb | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $1.2M and the median roster 31.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board