Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Michigan
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Michigan

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Maryland, College ParkUniversity of Michigan
100Roster159
55 overRoom under the D-I cap114 over
9Coaches24
$2,160,267Team budget$3,384,067
$21,602Spend per roster spot$21,283
84thBudget percentile93rd
989APR (multi-year)989
99%Players retained99%
$8,222,557Athletic aid, women's teams$13,811,731
30,608Undergraduates33,730
45%Admitted18%
1370–1520SAT middle 50%1350–1530
88%Graduate in 6 years93%
$59,686Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$75,626
$15,833Net price after grants$19,005
0.86Violent offences per 1,0002.06
SuburbSettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board