Women's Tennis · head to head
University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Michigan
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Maryland, College Park | University of Michigan | |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Roster | 9 |
| 1 over | Room under the D-I cap | room for 1 |
| 2 | Coaches | 4 |
| $1,264,818 | Team budget | $1,660,942 |
| $114,983 | Spend per roster spot | $184,549 |
| 84th | Budget percentile | 94th |
| 992 | APR (multi-year) | 1000 |
| 100% | Players retained | 100% |
| $8,222,557 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $13,811,731 |
| 30,608 | Undergraduates | 33,730 |
| 45% | Admitted | 18% |
| 1370–1520 | SAT middle 50% | 1350–1530 |
| 88% | Graduate in 6 years | 93% |
| $59,686 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $75,626 |
| $15,833 | Net price after grants | $19,005 |
| 0.86 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.06 |
| Suburb | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $546k and the median roster 9.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board