Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Maryland, Baltimore County vs University of New Hampshire
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of Maryland, Baltimore County vs University of New Hampshire
Division I · America East Conference
| University of Maryland, Baltimore County | University of New Hampshire | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Roster | 107 |
| 25 over | Room under the D-I cap | 62 over |
| 6 | Coaches | 5 |
| $901,649 | Team budget | $784,038 |
| $12,880 | Spend per roster spot | $7,327 |
| 46th | Budget percentile | 39th |
| 992 | APR (multi-year) | 998 |
| 100% | Players retained | 99% |
| $3,554,160 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $6,067,389 |
| 10,490 | Undergraduates | 11,376 |
| 74% | Admitted | 87% |
| 1220–1410 | SAT middle 50% | 1120–1320 |
| 70% | Graduate in 6 years | 77% |
| $49,526 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $55,846 |
| $17,704 | Net price after grants | $24,762 |
| 1.46 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.56 |
| Suburb | Setting | Town |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board