Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of California, Riverside vs University of California, Santa Barbara
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of California, Riverside vs University of California, Santa Barbara
Division I · Mountain Pacific Sports Federation - Women's Track, Indoor
| University of California, Riverside | University of California, Santa Barbara | |
|---|---|---|
| 112 | Roster | 55 |
| 67 over | Room under the D-I cap | 10 over |
| 5 | Coaches | 5 |
| $756,665 | Team budget | $400,473 |
| $6,755 | Spend per roster spot | $7,281 |
| 38th | Budget percentile | 13th |
| 980 | APR (multi-year) | 992 |
| 98% | Players retained | 100% |
| $2,621,353 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $3,360,459 |
| 22,646 | Undergraduates | 23,232 |
| 63% | Admitted | 28% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | — |
| 77% | Graduate in 6 years | 85% |
| $71,062 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $71,364 |
| $13,533 | Net price after grants | $15,283 |
| 0.78 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.14 |
| City | Setting | Suburb |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board