Programs›Women's Cross Country›University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Southern California
Women's Cross Country · head to head
University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Southern California
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of California, Los Angeles | University of Southern California | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 995 | APR (multi-year) | 1000 |
| 99% | Players retained | 100% |
| $9,235,885 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $13,525,051 |
| 33,040 | Undergraduates | 21,023 |
| 9% | Admitted | 10% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | 1440–1550 |
| 93% | Graduate in 6 years | 92% |
| $68,808 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $90,453 |
| $15,166 | Net price after grants | $41,496 |
| 2.15 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.57 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board