Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Men's Track & Field · head to head
University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of California, Los Angeles | University of Nebraska-Lincoln | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Roster | 111 |
| 45 over | Room under the D-I cap | 66 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 8 |
| $2,410,774 | Team budget | $3,296,910 |
| $26,786 | Spend per roster spot | $29,701 |
| 89th | Budget percentile | 97th |
| 977 | APR (multi-year) | 982 |
| 98% | Players retained | 98% |
| $9,893,320 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $7,103,791 |
| 33,040 | Undergraduates | 19,338 |
| 9% | Admitted | 77% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | 1090–1330 |
| 93% | Graduate in 6 years | 66% |
| $68,808 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $46,296 |
| $15,166 | Net price after grants | $18,029 |
| 2.15 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.2 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board