Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Men's Track & Field · head to head
University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of California, Los Angeles | University of Minnesota, Twin Cities | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Roster | 56 |
| 45 over | Room under the D-I cap | 11 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 9 |
| $2,410,774 | Team budget | $1,889,972 |
| $26,786 | Spend per roster spot | $33,749 |
| 89th | Budget percentile | 83rd |
| 977 | APR (multi-year) | 984 |
| 98% | Players retained | 98% |
| $9,893,320 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $9,757,332 |
| 33,040 | Undergraduates | 39,556 |
| 9% | Admitted | 77% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | 1310–1480 |
| 93% | Graduate in 6 years | 85% |
| $68,808 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $52,780 |
| $15,166 | Net price after grants | $16,730 |
| 2.15 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.09 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board