Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Michigan
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Michigan

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of Michigan
102Roster159
57 overRoom under the D-I cap114 over
9Coaches24
$2,732,210Team budget$3,384,067
$26,786Spend per roster spot$21,283
89thBudget percentile93rd
973APR (multi-year)989
98%Players retained99%
$9,235,885Athletic aid, women's teams$13,811,731
33,040Undergraduates33,730
9%Admitted18%
—SAT middle 50%1350–1530
93%Graduate in 6 years93%
$68,808Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$75,626
$15,166Net price after grants$19,005
2.15Violent offences per 1,0002.06
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board