Softball · head to head
University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Michigan
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of California, Los Angeles | University of Michigan | |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Roster | 25 |
| room for 2 | Room under the D-I cap | at cap |
| 4 | Coaches | 4 |
| $3,945,890 | Team budget | $3,207,710 |
| $171,560 | Spend per roster spot | $128,308 |
| 97th | Budget percentile | 91st |
| 977 | APR (multi-year) | 1000 |
| 99% | Players retained | 100% |
| $9,235,885 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $13,811,731 |
| 33,040 | Undergraduates | 33,730 |
| 9% | Admitted | 18% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | 1350–1530 |
| 93% | Graduate in 6 years | 93% |
| $68,808 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $75,626 |
| $15,166 | Net price after grants | $19,005 |
| 2.15 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.06 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $1.1M and the median roster 23.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board