Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of California, Irvine vs University of California, Riverside
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of California, Irvine vs University of California, Riverside
Division I · Mountain Pacific Sports Federation - Women's Track, Indoor
| University of California, Irvine | University of California, Riverside | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Roster | 112 |
| 15 over | Room under the D-I cap | 67 over |
| 7 | Coaches | 5 |
| $674,206 | Team budget | $756,665 |
| $11,236 | Spend per roster spot | $6,755 |
| 31st | Budget percentile | 38th |
| 981 | APR (multi-year) | 980 |
| 96% | Players retained | 98% |
| $2,963,571 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $2,621,353 |
| 29,503 | Undergraduates | 22,646 |
| 26% | Admitted | 63% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | — |
| 86% | Graduate in 6 years | 77% |
| $69,828 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $71,062 |
| $14,647 | Net price after grants | $13,533 |
| 1.62 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.78 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board