Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of California, Berkeley vs University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of California, Berkeley vs University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Division I · Atlantic Coast Conference
| University of California, Berkeley | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| 116 | Roster | 118 |
| 71 over | Room under the D-I cap | 73 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 6 |
| $2,105,528 | Team budget | $2,365,390 |
| $18,151 | Spend per roster spot | $20,045 |
| 82nd | Budget percentile | 85th |
| 996 | APR (multi-year) | 983 |
| 100% | Players retained | 98% |
| $10,832,606 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $8,028,006 |
| 33,078 | Undergraduates | 20,681 |
| 12% | Admitted | 19% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | 1370–1530 |
| 93% | Graduate in 6 years | 92% |
| $75,830 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $56,450 |
| $16,997 | Net price after grants | $11,140 |
| 2.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.17 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board