Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Arkansas, Fayetteville vs University of Missouri, Columbia
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville vs University of Missouri, Columbia
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of Arkansas, Fayetteville | University of Missouri, Columbia | |
|---|---|---|
| 130 | Roster | 119 |
| 85 over | Room under the D-I cap | 74 over |
| 5 | Coaches | 9 |
| $5,056,672 | Team budget | $2,844,658 |
| $38,897 | Spend per roster spot | $23,904 |
| 100th | Budget percentile | 90th |
| 973 | APR (multi-year) | 996 |
| 99% | Players retained | 99% |
| $5,516,647 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $5,163,687 |
| 27,472 | Undergraduates | 23,613 |
| 72% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1050–1220 | SAT middle 50% | 1150–1330 |
| 70% | Graduate in 6 years | 76% |
| $49,032 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $52,480 |
| $17,475 | Net price after grants | $20,006 |
| 0.66 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.71 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board