Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Alabama vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Alabama vs University of South Carolina, Columbia

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of AlabamaUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia
124Roster160
79 overRoom under the D-I cap115 over
7Coaches9
$3,398,602Team budget$4,302,617
$27,408Spend per roster spot$26,891
93rdBudget percentile99th
988APR (multi-year)982
99%Players retained98%
$7,931,284Athletic aid, women's teams$6,806,841
33,435Undergraduates28,470
76%Admitted61%
1170–1400SAT middle 50%1180–1380
74%Graduate in 6 years78%
$54,682Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$54,223
$21,761Net price after grants$26,068
1.17Violent offences per 1,0000.61
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board