Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Alabama vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of Alabama vs University of South Carolina, Columbia

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of AlabamaUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia
147Roster79
102 overRoom under the D-I cap34 over
7Coaches9
$3,353,932Team budget$2,611,514
$22,815Spend per roster spot$33,057
98thBudget percentile90th
950APR (multi-year)974
95%Players retained98%
$9,257,661Athletic aid, men's teams$6,953,077
33,435Undergraduates28,470
76%Admitted61%
1170–1400SAT middle 50%1180–1380
74%Graduate in 6 years78%
$54,682Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$54,223
$21,761Net price after grants$26,068
1.17Violent offences per 1,0000.61
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board