Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Alabama vs University of Missouri, Columbia
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of Alabama vs University of Missouri, Columbia

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of AlabamaUniversity of Missouri, Columbia
147Roster131
102 overRoom under the D-I cap86 over
7Coaches9
$3,353,932Team budget$2,503,909
$22,815Spend per roster spot$19,113
98thBudget percentile89th
950APR (multi-year)956
95%Players retained96%
$9,257,661Athletic aid, men's teams$6,232,907
33,435Undergraduates23,613
76%Admitted77%
1170–1400SAT middle 50%1150–1330
74%Graduate in 6 years76%
$54,682Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$52,480
$21,761Net price after grants$20,006
1.17Violent offences per 1,0000.71
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board