Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Alabama at Birmingham vs University of Texas at San Antonio
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Alabama at Birmingham vs University of Texas at San Antonio

Division I · American Conference
University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity of Texas at San Antonio
94Roster87
49 overRoom under the D-I cap42 over
4Coaches5
$1,127,778Team budget$1,371,792
$11,997Spend per roster spot$15,767
59thBudget percentile68th
984APR (multi-year)982
98%Players retained98%
$3,593,526Athletic aid, women's teams$2,896,389
12,382Undergraduates30,310
88%Admitted88%
1130–1400SAT middle 50%1000–1200
62%Graduate in 6 years51%
$42,411Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$37,740
$17,413Net price after grants$10,831
1.83Violent offences per 1,0000.52
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board