Women's Track & Field · head to head
The University of Tulsa vs University of Alabama at Birmingham
Division I · American Conference
| The University of Tulsa | University of Alabama at Birmingham | |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | Roster | 94 |
| room for 13 | Room under the D-I cap | 49 over |
| 3 | Coaches | 4 |
| $564,623 | Team budget | $1,127,778 |
| $17,644 | Spend per roster spot | $11,997 |
| 24th | Budget percentile | 59th |
| 995 | APR (multi-year) | 984 |
| 98% | Players retained | 98% |
| $7,886,717 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $3,593,526 |
| 2,485 | Undergraduates | 12,382 |
| 58% | Admitted | 88% |
| 1150–1490 | SAT middle 50% | 1130–1400 |
| 73% | Graduate in 6 years | 62% |
| $66,688 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $42,411 |
| $23,681 | Net price after grants | $17,413 |
| 2.64 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.83 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board