Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley vs University of the Incarnate Word
Women's Track & Field · head to head

The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley vs University of the Incarnate Word

Division I · Southland Conference
The University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyUniversity of the Incarnate Word
94Roster91
49 overRoom under the D-I cap46 over
5Coaches4
$914,487Team budget$1,192,269
$9,728Spend per roster spot$13,101
48thBudget percentile61st
985APR (multi-year)985
99%Players retained99%
$1,954,372Athletic aid, women's teams$5,280,061
27,040Undergraduates4,726
85%Admitted93%
910–1110SAT middle 50%900–1140
49%Graduate in 6 years53%
$34,557Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$53,970
$6,978Net price after grants$21,246
0.16Violent offences per 1,0000.71
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board