Programs›Women's Track & Field›The University of North Carolina at Greensboro vs University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Women's Track & Field · head to head
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro vs University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Division I · Southern Conference
| The University of North Carolina at Greensboro | University of Tennessee at Chattanooga | |
|---|---|---|
| 48 | Roster | 76 |
| 3 over | Room under the D-I cap | 31 over |
| 4 | Coaches | 2 |
| $166,137 | Team budget | $368,579 |
| $3,461 | Spend per roster spot | $4,849 |
| 4th | Budget percentile | 11th |
| 983 | APR (multi-year) | 993 |
| 98% | Players retained | 99% |
| $1,581,745 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $2,389,306 |
| 14,156 | Undergraduates | 9,982 |
| 90% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1100–1280 | SAT middle 50% | 1005–1185 |
| 58% | Graduate in 6 years | 53% |
| $38,059 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $34,610 |
| $10,592 | Net price after grants | $13,801 |
| 1.31 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.91 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board