Programs›Women's Cross Country›The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs University of North Texas
Women's Cross Country · head to head
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs University of North Texas
Division I · American Conference
| The University of North Carolina at Charlotte | University of North Texas | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 975 |
| 100% | Players retained | 99% |
| $2,863,777 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $2,960,607 |
| 23,981 | Undergraduates | 33,858 |
| 80% | Admitted | 72% |
| 1110–1320 | SAT middle 50% | 980–1230 |
| 68% | Graduate in 6 years | 60% |
| $39,334 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $37,067 |
| $13,768 | Net price after grants | $14,675 |
| 0.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.97 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board