Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs University of Alabama at Birmingham
Women's Track & Field · head to head

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs University of Alabama at Birmingham

Division I · American Conference
The University of North Carolina at CharlotteUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
145Roster94
100 overRoom under the D-I cap49 over
6Coaches4
$1,063,020Team budget$1,127,778
$7,331Spend per roster spot$11,997
55thBudget percentile59th
979APR (multi-year)984
99%Players retained98%
$2,863,777Athletic aid, women's teams$3,593,526
23,981Undergraduates12,382
80%Admitted88%
1110–1320SAT middle 50%1130–1400
68%Graduate in 6 years62%
$39,334Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$42,411
$13,768Net price after grants$17,413
0.61Violent offences per 1,0001.83
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board