Programs›Women's Cross Country›The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs University of Alabama at Birmingham
Women's Cross Country · head to head
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs University of Alabama at Birmingham
Division I · American Conference
| The University of North Carolina at Charlotte | University of Alabama at Birmingham | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 994 |
| 100% | Players retained | 100% |
| $2,863,777 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $3,593,526 |
| 23,981 | Undergraduates | 12,382 |
| 80% | Admitted | 88% |
| 1110–1320 | SAT middle 50% | 1130–1400 |
| 68% | Graduate in 6 years | 62% |
| $39,334 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $42,411 |
| $13,768 | Net price after grants | $17,413 |
| 0.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.83 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board