Programs›Women's Track & Field›The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs The University of Tulsa
Women's Track & Field · head to head
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs The University of Tulsa
Division I · American Conference
| The University of North Carolina at Charlotte | The University of Tulsa | |
|---|---|---|
| 145 | Roster | 32 |
| 100 over | Room under the D-I cap | room for 13 |
| 6 | Coaches | 3 |
| $1,063,020 | Team budget | $564,623 |
| $7,331 | Spend per roster spot | $17,644 |
| 55th | Budget percentile | 24th |
| 979 | APR (multi-year) | 995 |
| 99% | Players retained | 98% |
| $2,863,777 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $7,886,717 |
| 23,981 | Undergraduates | 2,485 |
| 80% | Admitted | 58% |
| 1110–1320 | SAT middle 50% | 1150–1490 |
| 68% | Graduate in 6 years | 73% |
| $39,334 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $66,688 |
| $13,768 | Net price after grants | $23,681 |
| 0.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.64 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board