Programs›Women's Cross Country›The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs The University of Tulsa
Women's Cross Country · head to head
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs The University of Tulsa
Division I · American Conference
| The University of North Carolina at Charlotte | The University of Tulsa | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | 25 |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | 8 over |
| 0 | Coaches | 2 |
| — | Team budget | $483,962 |
| — | Spend per roster spot | $19,358 |
| — | Budget percentile | 99th |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 995 |
| 100% | Players retained | 98% |
| $2,863,777 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $7,886,717 |
| 23,981 | Undergraduates | 2,485 |
| 80% | Admitted | 58% |
| 1110–1320 | SAT middle 50% | 1150–1490 |
| 68% | Graduate in 6 years | 73% |
| $39,334 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $66,688 |
| $13,768 | Net price after grants | $23,681 |
| 0.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.64 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board