Programs›Men's Cross Country›The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs The University of Tulsa
Men's Cross Country · head to head
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte vs The University of Tulsa
Division I · American Conference
| The University of North Carolina at Charlotte | The University of Tulsa | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | 24 |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | 7 over |
| 0 | Coaches | 4 |
| — | Team budget | $418,874 |
| — | Spend per roster spot | $17,453 |
| — | Budget percentile | 98th |
| 949 | APR (multi-year) | 983 |
| 96% | Players retained | 97% |
| $4,579,149 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $10,173,077 |
| 23,981 | Undergraduates | 2,485 |
| 80% | Admitted | 58% |
| 1110–1320 | SAT middle 50% | 1150–1490 |
| 68% | Graduate in 6 years | 73% |
| $39,334 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $66,688 |
| $13,768 | Net price after grants | $23,681 |
| 0.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.64 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $166k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board