Programs›Women's Cross Country›Texas A&M University-Kingsville vs The University of Texas Permian Basin
Women's Cross Country · head to head
Texas A&M University-Kingsville vs The University of Texas Permian Basin
Division II · Lone Star Conference
| Texas A&M University-Kingsville | The University of Texas Permian Basin | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | 7 |
| — | Coaches | 1 |
| — | Team budget | $70,764 |
| — | Spend per roster spot | $10,109 |
| — | Budget percentile | 44th |
| — | APR (multi-year) | — |
| — | Players retained | — |
| $1,087,418 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $870,247 |
| 5,187 | Undergraduates | 4,654 |
| 92% | Admitted | 84% |
| 980–1160 | SAT middle 50% | 910–1110 |
| 46% | Graduate in 6 years | 43% |
| $41,441 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $41,074 |
| $10,474 | Net price after grants | $10,143 |
| 1.8 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.36 |
| Town | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division II median budget is $81k and the median roster 10.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board