Programs›Women's Cross Country›Texas A&M University, College Station vs University of Texas at Austin
Women's Cross Country · head to head
Texas A&M University, College Station vs University of Texas at Austin
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| Texas A&M University, College Station | University of Texas at Austin | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 994 |
| 100% | Players retained | 99% |
| $5,914,617 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $7,450,570 |
| 59,933 | Undergraduates | 42,444 |
| 63% | Admitted | 29% |
| 1140–1380 | SAT middle 50% | 1230–1490 |
| 84% | Graduate in 6 years | 88% |
| $60,736 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $62,672 |
| $21,610 | Net price after grants | $18,036 |
| 1.74 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.78 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board