Women's Tennis · head to head
Texas A&M University, College Station vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| Texas A&M University, College Station | University of Tennessee, Knoxville | |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Roster | 11 |
| 1 over | Room under the D-I cap | 1 over |
| 3 | Coaches | 3 |
| $4,853,353 | Team budget | $1,955,142 |
| $441,213 | Spend per roster spot | $177,740 |
| 100th | Budget percentile | 98th |
| 986 | APR (multi-year) | 992 |
| 99% | Players retained | 98% |
| $5,914,617 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $11,447,980 |
| 59,933 | Undergraduates | 28,883 |
| 63% | Admitted | 46% |
| 1140–1380 | SAT middle 50% | 1190–1340 |
| 84% | Graduate in 6 years | 73% |
| $60,736 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $52,168 |
| $21,610 | Net price after grants | $20,885 |
| 1.74 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.37 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $546k and the median roster 9.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board