Programs›Women's Tennis›Texas A&M University, College Station vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Women's Tennis · head to head
Texas A&M University, College Station vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| Texas A&M University, College Station | University of South Carolina, Columbia | |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Roster | 8 |
| 1 over | Room under the D-I cap | room for 2 |
| 3 | Coaches | 3 |
| $4,853,353 | Team budget | $1,611,939 |
| $441,213 | Spend per roster spot | $201,492 |
| 100th | Budget percentile | 92nd |
| 986 | APR (multi-year) | 1000 |
| 99% | Players retained | 100% |
| $5,914,617 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $6,806,841 |
| 59,933 | Undergraduates | 28,470 |
| 63% | Admitted | 61% |
| 1140–1380 | SAT middle 50% | 1180–1380 |
| 84% | Graduate in 6 years | 78% |
| $60,736 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $54,223 |
| $21,610 | Net price after grants | $26,068 |
| 1.74 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.61 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $546k and the median roster 9.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board