Programs›Women's Track & Field›Tennessee Technological University vs The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Women's Track & Field · head to head
Tennessee Technological University vs The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Division I · Southern Conference
| Tennessee Technological University | The University of North Carolina at Greensboro | |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | Roster | 48 |
| 23 over | Room under the D-I cap | 3 over |
| 3 | Coaches | 4 |
| $653,533 | Team budget | $166,137 |
| $9,610 | Spend per roster spot | $3,461 |
| 31st | Budget percentile | 4th |
| 974 | APR (multi-year) | 983 |
| 96% | Players retained | 98% |
| $1,934,225 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $1,581,745 |
| 8,838 | Undergraduates | 14,156 |
| 83% | Admitted | 90% |
| 1020–1250 | SAT middle 50% | 1100–1280 |
| 54% | Graduate in 6 years | 58% |
| $37,298 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $38,059 |
| $15,138 | Net price after grants | $10,592 |
| 0.76 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.31 |
| Town | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board