Programs›Women's Cross Country›Tennessee Technological University vs The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Women's Cross Country · head to head
Tennessee Technological University vs The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Division I · Southern Conference
| Tennessee Technological University | The University of North Carolina at Greensboro | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 977 | APR (multi-year) | 983 |
| 97% | Players retained | 98% |
| $1,934,225 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $1,581,745 |
| 8,838 | Undergraduates | 14,156 |
| 83% | Admitted | 90% |
| 1020–1250 | SAT middle 50% | 1100–1280 |
| 54% | Graduate in 6 years | 58% |
| $37,298 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $38,059 |
| $15,138 | Net price after grants | $10,592 |
| 0.76 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.31 |
| Town | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board