Programs›Women's Tennis›Stephen F. Austin State University vs The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Women's Tennis · head to head
Stephen F. Austin State University vs The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Division I · Southland Conference
| Stephen F. Austin State University | The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Roster | 9 |
| room for 2 | Room under the D-I cap | room for 1 |
| 1 | Coaches | 2 |
| $457,386 | Team budget | $390,495 |
| $57,173 | Spend per roster spot | $43,388 |
| 40th | Budget percentile | 29th |
| 982 | APR (multi-year) | 975 |
| 98% | Players retained | 95% |
| $2,289,175 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $1,954,372 |
| 9,575 | Undergraduates | 27,040 |
| 88% | Admitted | 85% |
| 980–1160 | SAT middle 50% | 910–1110 |
| 52% | Graduate in 6 years | 49% |
| $36,884 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $34,557 |
| $15,498 | Net price after grants | $6,978 |
| 0.64 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.16 |
| Town | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $546k and the median roster 9.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board