Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of Southern California
Men's Track & Field · head to head

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of Southern California

Division I · Big Ten Conference
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New BrunswickUniversity of Southern California
152Roster82
107 overRoom under the D-I cap37 over
7Coaches8
$2,238,365Team budget$3,046,753
$14,726Spend per roster spot$37,155
87thBudget percentile94th
986APR (multi-year)1000
99%Players retained99%
$13,653,780Athletic aid, men's teams$15,118,920
36,588Undergraduates21,023
65%Admitted10%
1270–1480SAT middle 50%1440–1550
85%Graduate in 6 years92%
$56,479Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$90,453
$19,052Net price after grants$41,496
0.77Violent offences per 1,0001.57
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board