Programs›Women's Track & Field›Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of Michigan
Women's Track & Field · head to head
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of Michigan
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick | University of Michigan | |
|---|---|---|
| 125 | Roster | 159 |
| 80 over | Room under the D-I cap | 114 over |
| 7 | Coaches | 24 |
| $2,443,327 | Team budget | $3,384,067 |
| $19,546 | Spend per roster spot | $21,283 |
| 87th | Budget percentile | 93rd |
| 994 | APR (multi-year) | 989 |
| 100% | Players retained | 99% |
| $11,643,557 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $13,811,731 |
| 36,588 | Undergraduates | 33,730 |
| 65% | Admitted | 18% |
| 1270–1480 | SAT middle 50% | 1350–1530 |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 93% |
| $56,479 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $75,626 |
| $19,052 | Net price after grants | $19,005 |
| 0.77 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.06 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board