Programs›Women's Tennis›Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of Michigan
Women's Tennis · head to head
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of Michigan
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick | University of Michigan | |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Roster | 9 |
| room for 2 | Room under the D-I cap | room for 1 |
| 2 | Coaches | 4 |
| $1,217,357 | Team budget | $1,660,942 |
| $152,169 | Spend per roster spot | $184,549 |
| 83rd | Budget percentile | 94th |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 1000 |
| 100% | Players retained | 100% |
| $11,643,557 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $13,811,731 |
| 36,588 | Undergraduates | 33,730 |
| 65% | Admitted | 18% |
| 1270–1480 | SAT middle 50% | 1350–1530 |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 93% |
| $56,479 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $75,626 |
| $19,052 | Net price after grants | $19,005 |
| 0.77 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.06 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $546k and the median roster 9.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board