Programs›Women's Track & Field›Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of California, Los Angeles
Women's Track & Field · head to head
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of California, Los Angeles
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick | University of California, Los Angeles | |
|---|---|---|
| 125 | Roster | 102 |
| 80 over | Room under the D-I cap | 57 over |
| 7 | Coaches | 9 |
| $2,443,327 | Team budget | $2,732,210 |
| $19,546 | Spend per roster spot | $26,786 |
| 87th | Budget percentile | 89th |
| 994 | APR (multi-year) | 973 |
| 100% | Players retained | 98% |
| $11,643,557 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $9,235,885 |
| 36,588 | Undergraduates | 33,040 |
| 65% | Admitted | 9% |
| 1270–1480 | SAT middle 50% | — |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 93% |
| $56,479 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $68,808 |
| $19,052 | Net price after grants | $15,166 |
| 0.77 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.15 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board