Programs›Women's Cross Country›Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of California, Los Angeles
Women's Cross Country · head to head
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of California, Los Angeles
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick | University of California, Los Angeles | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 995 |
| 100% | Players retained | 99% |
| $11,643,557 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $9,235,885 |
| 36,588 | Undergraduates | 33,040 |
| 65% | Admitted | 9% |
| 1270–1480 | SAT middle 50% | — |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 93% |
| $56,479 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $68,808 |
| $19,052 | Net price after grants | $15,166 |
| 0.77 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.15 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board