Programs›Women's Track & Field›Mississippi State University vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Women's Track & Field · head to head
Mississippi State University vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| Mississippi State University | University of South Carolina, Columbia | |
|---|---|---|
| 99 | Roster | 160 |
| 54 over | Room under the D-I cap | 115 over |
| 8 | Coaches | 9 |
| $3,184,826 | Team budget | $4,302,617 |
| $32,169 | Spend per roster spot | $26,891 |
| 92nd | Budget percentile | 99th |
| 986 | APR (multi-year) | 982 |
| 99% | Players retained | 98% |
| $4,611,961 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $6,806,841 |
| 18,230 | Undergraduates | 28,470 |
| 76% | Admitted | 61% |
| 1110–1410 | SAT middle 50% | 1180–1380 |
| 63% | Graduate in 6 years | 78% |
| $46,219 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $54,223 |
| $16,480 | Net price after grants | $26,068 |
| 0.73 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.61 |
| Town | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board