Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›Mercer University vs The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Women's Track & Field · head to head

Mercer University vs The University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Division I · Southern Conference
Mercer UniversityThe University of North Carolina at Greensboro
27Roster48
room for 18Room under the D-I cap3 over
1Coaches4
$467,692Team budget$166,137
$17,321Spend per roster spot$3,461
18thBudget percentile4th
981APR (multi-year)983
99%Players retained98%
$4,743,593Athletic aid, women's teams$1,581,745
4,807Undergraduates14,156
66%Admitted90%
1180–1350SAT middle 50%1100–1280
73%Graduate in 6 years58%
$59,482Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$38,059
$24,197Net price after grants$10,592
2.03Violent offences per 1,0001.31
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board