Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›Lipscomb University vs Queens University of Charlotte
Women's Track & Field · head to head

Lipscomb University vs Queens University of Charlotte

Division I · Atlantic Sun Conference
Lipscomb UniversityQueens University of Charlotte
87Roster113
42 overRoom under the D-I cap68 over
5Coaches6
$1,325,768Team budget$718,453
$15,238Spend per roster spot$6,357
66thBudget percentile35th
984APR (multi-year)—
98%Players retained—
$3,906,856Athletic aid, women's teams$5,077,923
3,270Undergraduates1,373
67%Admitted68%
1145–1350SAT middle 50%1110–1300
69%Graduate in 6 years66%
$59,678Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$67,390
$27,386Net price after grants$27,178
0.53Violent offences per 1,0002.71
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board