Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›King University vs Shorter University
Women's Track & Field · head to head

King University vs Shorter University

Division II · Conference Carolinas
King UniversityShorter University
31Roster26
4Coaches2
$262,028Team budget$214,868
$8,452Spend per roster spot$8,264
46thBudget percentile38th
—APR (multi-year)—
—Players retained—
$1,827,365Athletic aid, women's teams$1,272,533
1,076Undergraduates1,322
54%Admitted97%
—SAT middle 50%900–1130
47%Graduate in 6 years36%
$50,284Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$37,188
$23,282Net price after grants$16,692
0Violent offences per 1,0001.26
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division II median budget is $287k and the median roster 55.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board