Programs›Women's Cross Country›East Texas A&M University vs The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Women's Cross Country · head to head
East Texas A&M University vs The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Division I · Southland Conference
| East Texas A&M University | The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| — | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| — | APR (multi-year) | 968 |
| — | Players retained | 96% |
| $2,377,633 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $1,954,372 |
| 8,318 | Undergraduates | 27,040 |
| 93% | Admitted | 85% |
| 940–1170 | SAT middle 50% | 910–1110 |
| 46% | Graduate in 6 years | 49% |
| $36,604 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $34,557 |
| $11,902 | Net price after grants | $6,978 |
| 0.86 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.16 |
| Town | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board