Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›College of Charleston (South Carolina) vs William & Mary
Women's Track & Field · head to head

College of Charleston (South Carolina) vs William & Mary

Division I · Coastal Athletic Association
College of Charleston (South Carolina)William & Mary
34Roster129
room for 11Room under the D-I cap84 over
5Coaches6
$160,523Team budget$1,353,630
$4,721Spend per roster spot$10,493
3rdBudget percentile67th
987APR (multi-year)998
98%Players retained100%
$3,607,330Athletic aid, women's teams$4,951,270
10,660Undergraduates6,963
72%Admitted33%
1130–1300SAT middle 50%1365–1510
65%Graduate in 6 years91%
$56,976Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$67,407
$20,806Net price after grants$20,422
1.15Violent offences per 1,0001.39
CitySettingSuburb

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board